data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca85b/ca85bcc69f4a7ad4e76bc2c6d3ad9bf116414012" alt=""
On a positive note, the story is generally interesting; the exploration into the psychology of military school training and the art of war is fascinating (I guess I can see why this is a recommended text for the USMC (along with "Starship Troopers" by Robert Heinlein)). Card's writing style provides a good pace to the novel, keeps the reader engaged and makes the book generally very easy to read. From this perspective I can see why "Ender's Game" has been typically voted the best science fiction novel of all-time for it's popular appeal.
On a negative note the characters are generally nothing special. Ender is uncomfortably likeable at the best of times but generally annoying at the worst (particularly towards the end of the book in his despair after his revelation). Other characters are generally two-dimensional. There are some interesting essays criticising Card's supposed justification for the violent actions of some of his characters (see Elaine Radford's review, "Ender and Hitler: Sympathy for the Superman" and John Kessel's essay "Creating the Innocent Killer: Ender's Game, Intention, and Morality"). These focus around the assertion that Card appears to be trying to convince the reader that intentions, and only intentions, rather than actions or consequences, are morally-judgeable.
Overall "Ender's Game" is a very entertaining read, and should be on every sci-fi lovers reading list, if at least for being in-the-know.
No comments:
Post a Comment